Type something to search...
Large machined metal ring resting on a support in an industrial interior
  • By Jason/ On 11 Sep, 2026

AMS6910E Published: “Forgings” No Longer Listed in SAE’s Public Scope

Product-form example: a machined metal ring.

SAE International revised AMS6910 to revision E on September 10, 2026. The clearest change on its public page is the product-form wording: forgings are no longer listed, while bars and stock for forging remain. The specification names the titanium alloy 8Al-1Mo-1V in the duplex-annealed condition.

  • Buying a shaped part? Distinguish a forging from material supplied for subsequent forging; the two are separate categories in the D listing.
  • Already ordering to D? Check the specified revision and any customer transition instructions before changing the order reference.

What the public D and E pages show

Public-page itemAMS6910DAMS6910E
Revision dateAugust 19, 2022September 10, 2026
Alloy and condition in the title8Al-1Mo-1V, duplex annealedSame designation
BarsUp to 4.000 in (101.60 mm), inclusiveSame stated limit
ForgingsListed, with thickness up to 4.000 in (101.60 mm), inclusiveNot separately listed
Stock for forgingAny sizeAny size

For bars, the size limit refers to nominal diameter or the least distance between parallel sides—not length. The “any size” wording belongs to forging stock, so it should not be read as removing the bar limit. SAE’s D page and E page support this comparison.

This is a public-scope comparison, not a review of the full standards. Technical changes and the treatment of a particular order still need to be checked against the full text and its governing documents.

Forgings and forging stock are different supply stages

Rows of large cylindrical metal stock with dark and bright surfaces on workshop supports

Illustration: cylindrical stock, contrasted with a shaped workpiece.

Forging shapes metal under pressure into a part. A forging is the resulting workpiece; it may still require machining before reaching its final dimensions. Forging stock is material—such as wrought rod or bar—supplied as input for a later forging operation. These distinctions follow the Forging Industry Association’s process explanation and QC Forge’s terminology.

That makes the purchase description important. A shaped workpiece and the stock from which one will be forged can share an alloy designation without being the same deliverable. Calling both “titanium material” loses precisely the distinction visible in the D/E comparison.

Two hypothetical purchasing situations

An existing D-revision order for a forging. A buyer has ordered a shaped workpiece with AMS6910D explicitly specified. The useful first question is whether the order remains tied to D or whether the customer has issued a transition instruction. Substituting “E” automatically would skip that decision.

A new E-revision inquiry for forging stock. A buyer needs bar-shaped feedstock for a subsequent forging operation. Forging stock remains named in the E public scope. The inquiry should identify that intended supply form, dimensions and required revision, then ask the supplier to confirm the applicable full-standard requirements and its ability to meet them. A bar-shaped appearance alone does not resolve the procurement category.

Start with the business actually affected

First check whether the work concerns this alloy, AMS6910 and a relevant product form. If it does, identify the affected quotations or orders and resolve their revision requirements; extend the review to linked qualification records only where those records actually depend on the requirement being examined. This is a proportionate purchasing recommendation, not an additional obligation stated by SAE’s public pages.

For an inquiry, provide the alloy, product form, dimensions and specified standard revision. Those details give a supplier a concrete basis for confirming applicability and supply capability.

Sources

Public sources checked September 11, 2026.

FAQ

# What if an order cites AMS6910 without a revision letter?
Check the governing purchase specification, drawing or customer revision-control rule to find how that undated reference is resolved. The missing letter alone does not tell you whether D or E applies. Resolve the reference with the responsible order owner.
# What should a technical D-to-E comparison focus on?
Start with the requirements relevant to the purchased form and condition, then compare the associated processing, testing and acceptance clauses in the full texts. This article has not verified changes to those clauses. Review scope should follow the actual product and order requirements.

Need this material? Get a factory-direct quote.

Get a Quote

Related Posts

Ready to Start Your Project?

Get factory-direct pricing on titanium products. No minimum order.

Get a Quote
Quick Inquiry